I don't think we can really expect the device to act like a full fledged tablet no?
When Microsoft throws around slogans like "the tablet that can replace your laptop" . . . yea. For better or for worse, the iPad IS the benchmark for tablet functionality, and the SB is essentially an SP4 attached to a really nice keyboard.
At the end of the day I agree wholeheartedly with your assessment: The right tool for the job is my phone [or a separate tablet] when I need to set an alarm. I'm fully aware I'm being overly hard on the Surface hardware, but there's no reason that the sleep states can't be significantly improved upon from where they are now.
It's a first world problem, I'm never far from an outlet, and I don't typically use my device like that ANYWAY. . but it still bugs me that if I HAD to, I COULDN'T.
JNJ:
Awesome answer, pretty much confirms my understanding of connected standby. It also explains somewhat the power drain I experienced last night/this morning.
I'm going to chalk this one up as an engineering dispute. Legacy vs connected standby is really a non-issue on this, it's a simple question of what saves more power. Going into a deeper sleep state and periodically waking up to burst check for packet data VS trying to develop a lower power continuously on hybrid sleep state.
I'm also not a hardware engineer, so for all I know there's a very obvious reason of which I am unaware, and I'm not trying to pit one O/S against another.. [I use both, they both have their uses] I'm just asking the questions to increase my overall understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of my device so that I can more fully utilize it to it's fullest potential.