FlySwatter
Active Member
Which I read through completely. Face-palm! I must be getting old; oh yeah, I am.It's in the original post
powercfg /batteryreport /output %USERPROFILE%\Desktop\battery_report.html
Which I read through completely. Face-palm! I must be getting old; oh yeah, I am.It's in the original post
powercfg /batteryreport /output %USERPROFILE%\Desktop\battery_report.html
Thanks. Too bad about the HiDPI version sucking battery; but presumably that will be largely addressed in optimization and finalization.About Chrome battery life
http://www.anandtech.com/show/8397/browser-battery-life-chrome-37-beta-revisited
I don't have any faith on Google.Thanks. Too bad about the HiDPI version sucking battery; but presumably that will be largely addressed in optimization and finalization.
Why so? Do you think they are putting more resources into their own Chrome OS instead?I don't have any faith on Google.
No,they are putting a lot of resources making anything that runs on Windows to look worse than the version for Android.Why so? Do you think they are putting more resources into their own Chrome OS instead?
Sort of what I was hinting at, but was hoping it was more of a "we need to prioritize our resources to Chrome OS primary, Win OS secondary". I hope they aren't actively making adverse Win OS code.No,they are putting a lot of resources making anything that runs on Windows to look worse than the version for Android.