daniielrp
Active Member
Amen.
The same could've been said about Windows 7 is what Windows Vista should have been. Same goes for Windows XP is what Windows ME should have been... and so on.
Seems that when Microsoft releases a new OS, the next iteration is really what have been released, but due to timelines and pressure, they release it well before they have thought through all the changes and have dealt with the major issues.
I don't agree with the timelines issue - There was a 5 year gap between XP and Vista, and a 3 year gap between 7 and 8 - this should be more than enough time for testing. I think what they needed was PUBLIC trials, massive public trials, which they only get with a full release.