Wow. I wish you had remembered saying this when you responded to me in the "After the Apple event..." thread. I pointed out that the capacitive sensors on the Surface RT were of a lower resolution than the iPad and you challenged my statement claiming that it was an apples-n-oranges comparison.
And then the Adonit Jot Pro works perfectly fine. So what? The Surface screen works great with touch, which is what most users will use anyway, and plenty of users have already demonstrated that it works fine with handwriting/note-taking. If the screen is truly inferior in any way, usually people pick on the visual resolution.
Your obsession with this one factor notwithstanding, let me remind you that in product development, some corners are always cut when looking at the big picture. I'm sure MS could have put a better capacitive screen on there--they could've added "better" a lot of things. I suspect they didn't because people who do want to ink regularly and are picky about it should opt for the Pro, in their thinking, as a premium product; Apple doesn't offer true stylus support for
any of their i-stuff, right? The big picture for MS at this point is that the Pro does have a stylus; as long as the Surface RT class screens aren't sucky for touch in regular use, then it's "good enough" and not an actual
flaw for the vast majority of use cases.
Don't get me wrong, it'd be great if Tegra4's DS was enabled someday for even passive pen input, but if you wanted to complain about actual flaws, the initial kickstand single-angle is a far better one to pick.