Apple doesn't make their own batteries.
I hope they don't keep the same dimensions for the Pro 3. That's the biggest complaint right now is thickness and weight. Everything else is perfect for me. If they can just make it thinner and lighter, it would be perfect. Considering it's the 3rd generation, they should have a new body for it.I was with the team in New York and if I was to guess based on what I heard, I would think Surface 3 (not Pro 3) would be a NVidia 64bit SoC with 4GB RAM with a QHD Display and 802.11 AC.
Pro will be Broadwell SoC with the exact same dimensions as the first 2 Generations so that the accessories all work with other incremental improvements (802.11 AC, QHD Display, improved cameras).
I hope they don't keep the same dimensions for the Pro 3. That's the biggest complaint right now is thickness and weight. Everything else is perfect for me. If they can just make it thinner and lighter, it would be perfect. Considering it's the 3rd generation, they should have a new body for it.
Some of what you suggest would be difficult to achieve. For example, various MS officials have stated that they will keep the full-sized USB port, which rules out a slimmer Surface. And, the consensus is that a full-sized USB port of immense value. Weight, however, may be a distinct possibility what with the iPad Air having set a standard of sorts. Particularly for the SP3, the key would be to get a SoC that would not require a fan-centric cooling system. That could reduce thickness with the caveat that the thinnest profile would be determined by the USB port.
Some of what you suggest would be difficult to achieve. For example, various MS officials have stated that they will keep the full-sized USB port, which rules out a slimmer Surface. And, the consensus is that a full-sized USB port of immense value. Weight, however, may be a distinct possibility what with the iPad Air having set a standard of sorts. Particularly for the SP3, the key would be to get a SoC that would not require a fan-centric cooling system. That could reduce thickness with the caveat that the thinnest profile would be determined by the USB port.
Keeping USB doesn't mean they can't make it thinner, if you look at the 2013 Nexus 7 for example. Microsoft could do what ASUS did, support USB via means of an OTG cable - works great! I would imagine the reason the Surface Pro is so thick ultimately comes down to the CPU. To accommodate for it you need a fan and one honkin' beast of a battery.
I think as CPUs become smaller and batteries better we will see thinner build of this device.
Having to have an otg cable would defeat the purpose of a useful mobile computer device.
If you want thinness over usefulness so much, why not just go with the ipad air or ipad mini?
Businesses have been trying to make the ipad useful for a few years now. And every story I've heard and seen have always ended with the ipad turning into a really expensive email device. That is what the surface will become if you sacrifice usefulness for thinness.
Having to have an otg cable would defeat the purpose of a useful mobile computer device.
If you want thinness over usefulness so much, why not just go with the ipad air or ipad mini?
Businesses have been trying to make the ipad useful for a few years now. And every story I've heard and seen have always ended with the ipad turning into a really expensive email device. That is what the surface will become if you sacrifice usefulness for thinness.
doesn't that new sony windows tablet have a full sized usb port? look how thin that is. it has basically same specs as the pro. so thinning the pro out can be done.