They use it differently -- the SFPro2 sleeps often, while the SF is always on (connected standby). Also, I suspect bandwidth expectations on RT are lower...Not quite sure I understand. If it's the same hardware, wouldn't the Marvell WiFi be as good (or bad) in the Surface 2 and Surface Pro 2? If so, I'd expect MS would be getting a lot of complaints about WiFi performance. What would keep MS from using a better adapter? Surely there are better performing adapters available to MS for about the same cost.
"Heat gun". I do not plan to try that either until warranty expires, thoughBTW I've been told--I don't know from my own experience--that Apple products are the worst, having thin, hard to open and fragile shells. IOW without special tools, they are very hard to work on. In that respect, the SP2 is no better as it is glued together, and no instructions available telling how to unglue it. Anyway that's not something I'm ready to try.
Ah, SP2 owners notice more, demand more performance. Could be. Connected standby would be a nice feature.They use it differently -- the SFPro2 sleeps often, while the SF is always on (connected standby). Also, I suspect bandwidth expectations on RT are lower...
Ooh, a far braver soul than I..."Heat gun". I do not plan to try that either until warranty expires, though