There's no way that they did away with Bluetooth on the SP3 series. Bluetooth is a lock on all modern digital devices.
He was talking about the Bluetooth Keyboard adapter....
There's no way that they did away with Bluetooth on the SP3 series. Bluetooth is a lock on all modern digital devices.
This point it moot because once you've attached the keyboard you have the Windows key on there that you can use. Also, for people saying it's better at the side when holding the machine, I don't agree... you're much more likely to accidentally touch it there, plus you won't be holding it anyway when the keyboard is attached to 'lapability' mode! Really stupid decision imo and it looks shit.
Kayzee, its not just about functionality. It's the Logo. What company in the world would want their logo covered on their products?
I believe the only reason they moved it was it was getting accidently pushed in the position it was in.
Well, lets consider the best hardware manufacturer around, Apple. Now don't get me wrong I think the Surface is absolutely on par with what they do... but guess what, the iPhone/iPad doesn't even have a logo on the front!
There is no need to have a logo just for the sake of having a logo, that screams of desperation. I understand it more from the perspective of the rear of whatever you're using (surely the reason they changed it from the Windows logo to 'Surface') because others will see that, but whatever's facing you, is just for you, and... you should know what you're using lol.
I hear you, but in all honestly I have to disagree. Logo's are about branding, leaving a lasting impression whether it's an audience of one or one hundred. Check out steering wheels of cars, there is most likely a logo there. How many people see that logo beyond the driver (and maybe a VERY ANNOYING back seat driver?). What about your watch? There's a logo on the face of it, for how many people is that placement attracting? But all that pales in comparison to Logo's placed on tags inside your clothing.. surely there's a very limited audience for that one... yet it's still there waiting for your eyes to locate it when dressing/undressing.
As for Apple, well I disagree with you there as well. When turned on the iOS itself acts as a logo for the company. The design of the OS is so recognizable and differentiated from other OS's that almost anyone can recognize it instantly. Now the iOS is not exactly a 'logo' but it is an iconic image for Apple. And besides, there is no law saying there HAS to be a logo on the face of things, but it is a very common practice to place one there anyways. Nokia, HTC, Samsung etc all place their names on the faces of their phones and I'm pretty positive the users of their products know what they are using. Further, in those I just listed all but MSFT place their names in the most prominent position on the device, along the top. I think that is a much better placement for the windows logo than along the side, but the side makes more sense for function as your hands are a) there anyways when holding in landscape, b) closer to your hands when typing.